Humans are
innately selfish. It is a built-in part of our evolutionary survival instinct.
Whether individuals plough their own furrow or cooperate within some form of
group, it's because they judge it to be in their own personal interest to do
so.
If we can acknowledge this, we would, both on an individual and societal level,
make better decisions by being more sceptical of authority.
“Oh, but I
know people who often do things for others with no benefit to themselves. I
even do things like that myself”, you may say.
I understand
what you mean, of course. And on a small-scale personal level, it can happen.
But I would gently point out that even then, whether hoping for a favour in
return in the future, or even just the glow of self-righteousness you get from
performing the act can be construed as, if not outright selfishness, then
gaining some form of benefit.
Certainly,
when you move away from small interpersonal interactions, the idea that
something may be bad for us personally but best for the majority in society is
one we understand in concept but can rarely bring ourselves to act out.
Rather, we spend a lot of mental effort rationalising why what is bad for us personally
is bad for wider society and what is good for us personally is good for wider society.
Life is just so much easier that way, isn’t it?
No-one champions, let alone votes for, a system or a societal change which they believe will make their own life materially or meaningfully worse. And I use these words deliberately.
We are sometimes prepared to live with minor inconvenience to 'do the right thing'; to appear, both to ourselves and others, as virtuous, but nothing major, nothing meaningful, nothing material.
For example, people who are comfortably off financially may be prepared to
advocate for a rise in tax rates such that they too would have a bit less
disposable income.
However, if the tax increases being suggested were of a magnitude that meant
they would struggle to maintain their current lifestyle, their support for the
idea would disappear faster than water in a sieve.
If someone
is advocating for something, it is either because they believe they already do,
or will in the future, directly benefit from it - or, at the very least, that there
will be no meaningful downside for them or their immediate family.
The consequences
of our views for other folk are either something we can claim credit for if
good, or unfortunate but necessary collateral damage, if bad.
But the primary driver is always ‘what’s in it for me?’
It might be money, it might be fame, it may be praise, it may be future benefits.
But one way or another, we only do it if we believe that in some way, we benefit personally.
Our belief
may prove to be wrong of course; but cultivating wisdom is a different and much more difficult discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment